- October 22, 2017 at 6:39 pm #46432
For some reason I cannot get estlcam to give me the right depth on text. No matter what I do I always seem to get a depth of Z-1.5875. Please look this over and see if anyone can help
I select a tool that has a depth of 10mm. (I am cutting in foam).
I set up text with a cutting depth of 10 mm
I type in the text and preview and it looks like it is only a couple of mm deep.
I check the gcode and it shows Z of -1.5875.
When I run the code with repetier host it comes out shallow.
Any clues?October 22, 2017 at 7:23 pm #46436
weird. Can you post the estlcam file?October 23, 2017 at 3:58 am #46454
Do you mean the project file? Here it is.
The forum would not allow me to post a file with extension .e10.
I zipped the file up and that extension is allowed.
Attachments:October 23, 2017 at 10:01 am #46497
Thanks for posting that. I opened it up, and it’s doing the same to me. I have a slightly older 10.something version of estlcam installed right now.
TL;DR, click on the letters, and choose “Pocket Inside” instead of “Carve Inside”.
It’s got carving selected, which is what you’d do if you were using an angled bit. The angled bit would allow it to get into the corners and raise up a little, so it would make a point in the corners. With a flat-bottomed bit, you can’t do that, but something in the math of estlcam is thinking it’s going to try, even though you’ve set the bit size to be 1/8″ and 90 degrees. That math is coming up with a max depth of 1.5875 or whatever. It thinks it can’t go down deep enough to fit the bit in the letter at 10mm.
If you want to have more control than that, then I suggest making the letters in another program, like inkscape and loading them into EstlCAM as an svg or dxf. If you just want to write at 10mm, then just choose “pocket inside” instead.
1 user thanked author for this post.October 23, 2017 at 1:16 pm #46515
That looks like the clue! I never even looked at those options. I have not had a chance to try it out but the preview and the gcode certainly look like it should work. I’ll try this on my machine first chance I get.
SandyOctober 25, 2017 at 8:29 am #46648
An update. I tried the suggestion provided by Jeffeb3 and everything worked as desired.
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.